🔗 Share this article

Keir Starmer is facing rebellion from MPs after ministers abandoned plans to provide employees immediate safeguards against wrongful termination, a U-turn that breaches the campaign commitments.

Lawmakers Express Worries

MPs including a previous cabinet member who spearheaded the employment rights bill have voiced concerns regarding the retreat declared by ministers.

Ministers have axed the proposal to remove the 24-month "qualifying period" for workers to file wrongful termination cases and permit them to act from the first day in a new job, to facilitate passing the proposed law through government.

Government Impasse

The legislation became trapped in a standoff between upper and lower chambers regarding the initial proposal to give workers the protection from the start, as well as measures to outlaw predatory flexible hour arrangements.

The government now intends to implement the entitlement concerning unjust firing following half a year employment instead, although additional first-day entitlements to paternity leave and sick pay remain scheduled to move forward, coming into effect in April 2026.

Backlash and Criticism

The Labour MP for the Teesside area labeled the action as a "total abandonment" and pledged to advocate for its overturning.

"We are unable to endorse that halfway measure."

"This constitutes flawed decision-making and I will campaign to overturn this compromise."

Another Labour MP expressed frustration concerning inadequate dialogue, observing: "There has been zero consultation with the PLP. Peers shouldn't override concerning campaign pledges, so why have we capitulated??"

Wider Consequences

A third Labour MP stated: "Businesses should not worry regarding first-day entitlements, but workers have everything to fear from companies who resists first-day entitlements."

The ex-labor secretary affirmed that the decision "undoubtedly constitutes a pledge violation."

Ministerial Explanation

The education secretary explained existed a "genuine possibility" the enactment of the employment rights bill would have been delayed without the cabinet's decision regarding a U-turn over day one protections against wrongful termination.

"There has been discussion on the point around unjust firing and the duration requirement among companies, labor organizations and ministers, and after those talks consensus has emerged concerning future direction, which is welcome."

The secretary highlighted that "Consequently the qualifying period will decrease from 24 months to half a year, and that runs alongside significant first-day entitlements regarding health-related payments and about family time off."

"But the risk here was had advancement not occurred, those important rights could remain inactive starting spring 2026."

When questioned about if it constituted a broken promise, the secretary answered: "Within the election platform, the promise indicated was that we intended to collaborate with labor organizations, with business, with community groups, through dialogue regarding those protections that we'd be bringing forward."

"Therefore, two components exist regarding that matter, throughout the campaign document, the important rights and the dialogue."