🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute little “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a struggle between a defunct facility, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the people who see them each day.

After the national authorities blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed warned to end their lives unless the government covers the expense of their survival. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Experts say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and group interactions indicate they are highly cognitive creatures – something Kristy Burgess discovered directly.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that required earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so astounded by the nuances and unique traits in their characters. She developed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing natures.

“Eve selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “They altered the way I perceive relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the park attributes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say indicates the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not operate to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the closure. “Concrete is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a request for comment, but earlier claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality veterinary services and around the clock care than any individual in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was terminated from the facility in recent months following the demise of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park suspected particulars of the death were leaked to the news outlets and she was let go shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and other caretakers in distress. She says the park’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any efforts to euthanize even a one beluga would require “significant manpower”, trucks and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She backs calls for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a proposal to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the application would have meant a ongoing life in enclosure and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that belugas should be in the sea, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience authorize an relocation that would continue the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s comments indicate a wider lack of awareness of the realities of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As officials struggle to find a resolution, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of food for local populations.

A planned protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has shown to be contentious. The prospective facility, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Advocates remain hopeful that it could in time represent a permanent resolution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary reflects a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable solution in the near future.

The project lead, head of the initiative, said the site will mimic the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|